Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Skye seascape.
Collapse
X
-
Re: Skye seascape.
Nice Dave but I think your horizon needs a bit of adjustment.Also I feel it could be a bit sharper at a lower F stop,at 12 mm the Dof is very deep even at lower apature.
Nice composition though.All the best
Being left handed my brain sometimes works sdrawkcab
Andy
Lots of cameras and lenses.
My Flickr
-
Re: Skye seascape.
Sorry Dave,but for me personally much too much foreground. If you take away the foreground and leave it as a letter box type shot,it just appears then to be too distant a shot to be anything special.
ps sorry do not not have editing software currently available to demonstrate what i meanBenedict
---------
People may not remember exactly what you did, or what you said, but they will always remember how you made them feel.
Comment
-
Re: Skye seascape.
I like it but agree with Andy that it feels like the horizon is sloping a little.
I don't know how close the nearest detail is in the foreground but the hyperfocal distance for 12mm on Four Thirds is 2 feet at f/16, so maybe David is spot on? Of course some sharpness is sacrificed for the depth of field, but it's all relative in the end.
IanFounder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (https://www.e-group.uk.net)
Comment
-
Re: Skye seascape.
Thanks for your comments guys. I did wonder about the horizon, on the left it looks like it is sloping but horizontal in the distance.
Not sure what you mean Andy re the f stop, I couldn't make it much smaller than f16.sigpicDave
Comment
-
-
Re: Skye seascape.
Originally posted by andym View PostSorry not being clear,lower number,larger apature.Just so diffrection softening does not affect your picture.
IanFounder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (https://www.e-group.uk.net)
Comment
-
Re: Skye seascape.
Originally posted by Benedict View PostSorry Dave,but for me personally much too much foreground. If you take away the foreground and leave it as a letter box type shot,it just appears then to be too distant a shot to be anything special.
A stunning shot nevertheless, where on Skye is it?
DavidPBase Galleries:-http://www.pbase.com/davidmorisonimages
Comment
-
Re: Skye seascape.
Originally posted by David Morison View PostIt's the foreground that makes it for me so I think the balance is about right. The tiny fishing boat in the distance either needs to be sharper or cloned out as the eye is led to it but once there it is lacking in detail. The very dark rocks to the right are an essential part of the image for me but could do with a bit of shadow lightening to bring out a little detail, otherwise they tend to dominate the horizon.
A stunning shot nevertheless, where on Skye is it?
DavidsigpicDave
Comment
-
Re: Skye seascape.
Yes Dave, I think that has done the trick for me, with a little more detail in the rocks. It now shows a little blueness in those shadows so a final tweak involving a slight blue reduction will make it perfect. The problem is we all see colours differently as we get older and although we compensate it still sometimes leaves us with a different colour perception, so please excuse me if I'm seeing blue where others don't.
Thanks for showing.
DavidPBase Galleries:-http://www.pbase.com/davidmorisonimages
Comment
-
Re: Skye seascape.
Just removing the boat brought out a couple of nice diagonals from the seaweed to the lone rock to the prominent rocks just below the horizon. What a huge result from a tiny change!-----------
Cathrine
sigpic
My photoblog: http://csspikkerud.zenfolio.com/blog
My gallery: http://csspikkerud.zenfolio.com/
My book on Viovio
Comment
-
Re: Skye seascape.
I like it Dave nice to have the opportunity to photograph such a lovely scene.
JohnROlympus E3] [E300] OMD-M5 12.50mm] ZD [40.150] ZD [14.45] ZD 50.200] ZD [14.54] ZD [35macro] ZD [11.22] ZD [1.4x EC- 14] ZD [EX-25] [RM. CB 1] [FL-36] [FL-50]
Manfrotto Tripod.
Comment
Comment