WELCOME This site is for anyone interested in Olympus and OM System system cameras. First time visit? Check out our FAQ. You need to REGISTER before you can post. After registration and two posts, forum ads will disappear.
* Registered members don't see ads on the forum after two posts - sign up for free *
** We are aware that image uploading is currently not working properly and we're working on it. We're very sorry for the inconvenience and hope we can return to normal ASAP. **
Had a try with lightroom do not know if this is any better? Do not know what to do to cut down on the noise.
Comments?
Ed. I just slide the luminance slider, under noise reduction, to the right to correct noise. It does the job. Probably others who could give more info on here.
I think a better colour balance can be achieved - even from the jpg I got this
which is still a little too green perhaps in the background. But lacks the colour artifacts which affected Wee Mans revision.
I would expect the raw file can be got even closer.
(this was done by waggling the sliders in The GIMPS GEGL White Balance operation - have no idea what GEGL means or how the sliders should really be used)
Thanks Nick that looks much better than mine. I know I have a long way to go getting shots and an even longer way sorting software fixes but you giuys have shown me which way to go. I will go back to the RAW file and work on it. Thanks again all.
Nick that looks so GREEN!
I know we all see colours differently but ... that's a lot of it.
WeeMan's had some orangey bits, are they the 'colour artefacts' you mention?
Nick that looks so GREEN!
I know we all see colours differently but ... that's a lot of it.
WeeMan's had some orangey bits, are they the 'colour artefacts' you mention?
Well the orangey bits (on the bird) seem more purple to me - Wee Mans conversion also seemed to overblow an area at the base of the wing.
I think I've got the bird closer to right (egrets are startlingly white, I've seen lots and they always stand out as pure white whatever the light). But the background is too green - I did try to get the backgound right - but I don't think the jpeg contains the necessary info, that's why I think working on the raw file conversion will give a better result.
But there is always a subjective element - and of course I may well be wrong.
The egret feeding, splashing the drops of water, looks the best of the bunch in my eyes.
I agree. It was great timing to capture those splashes.
John
"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there � even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Very nice, I think, better than I've done. "BIF" for me usually means "Birds In Float." And even that can be difficult.
The hardest version of BIF is "Birds In Fog."
John
"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there � even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of web browser cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, and to analyse site activity. No banner advertising is shown to members logged in to the site. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment