Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Forget me nots

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Forget me nots

    Just a grab shot hand held with the hired 300 2.8 + 1.4 TC...

    I was following a buzzard and these jumped out at me in a field.

    BTW - that lens is SO HEAVY
    Keith


    http://www.flickr.com/photos/68459774@N05

    E500,E510 now dead,E520 (now retired),E600 and Grip,14-42,14-45,2x40-150,Sigmas 105 and 135-400 Now Dead..ex 25. Manfrotto 190. Plus lots of OM stuff.
    Now also 4 items from the dark side...........

  • #2
    Re: Forget me nots

    How on Earth did you hand hold that lens and converter for this shot?

    I'm impressed.
    John

    "A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there � even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Forget me nots

      Thanks John....
      So you know all about it then.
      When I hired it I thought it would be on the scale of the 70-300.

      It IS heavy but strangely it feels a lot more balanced than the Sigma 135-400.
      I have tried it with some Gulls whizzing about overhead and managed at least as many as with the siggy.
      I am hoping for some better weather over the next 3 days so I can get some use out of it.

      I took 2 of this and the other had no focal point so I must have moved a bit.
      Keith


      http://www.flickr.com/photos/68459774@N05

      E500,E510 now dead,E520 (now retired),E600 and Grip,14-42,14-45,2x40-150,Sigmas 105 and 135-400 Now Dead..ex 25. Manfrotto 190. Plus lots of OM stuff.
      Now also 4 items from the dark side...........

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Forget me nots

        Originally posted by ringneck View Post
        Thanks John....
        So you know all about it then.
        When I hired it I thought it would be on the scale of the 70-300.

        It IS heavy but strangely it feels a lot more balanced than the Sigma 135-400.
        I have tried it with some Gulls whizzing about overhead and managed at least as many as with the siggy.
        I am hoping for some better weather over the next 3 days so I can get some use out of it.

        I took 2 of this and the other had no focal point so I must have moved a bit.
        I've never used one myself but I've been with Andy Elliot when he's been using his and seen what it's like.

        Have fun while you've got it!
        John

        "A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there � even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Forget me nots

          I have already.
          Keith


          http://www.flickr.com/photos/68459774@N05

          E500,E510 now dead,E520 (now retired),E600 and Grip,14-42,14-45,2x40-150,Sigmas 105 and 135-400 Now Dead..ex 25. Manfrotto 190. Plus lots of OM stuff.
          Now also 4 items from the dark side...........

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Forget me nots

            Lovely shot of forget-me-nots, Keith. Re the weight of that gear have you considered going m43 ... I tell you what mate, once you've tried it you'll never turn back.
            I have an E-3 and an E-520 that I've no further use for. Superb new lenses are continually being added to the line up. Liberating !

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Forget me nots

              Originally posted by pandora View Post
              Lovely shot of forget-me-nots, Keith. Re the weight of that gear have you considered going m43 ... I tell you what mate, once you've tried it you'll never turn back.
              I have an E-3 and an E-520 that I've no further use for. Superb new lenses are continually being added to the line up. Liberating !
              Unfortunately a 300/2.8 (or 420/4) would be as big and heavy in m43 as in big43 - ye canna change the laws o' physics, captain!

              Ciao ... John

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Forget me nots

                Thanks Mark....yes I have been looking at micro.
                Will wait and see if they can get a really long lens that can produce quality images ...even with me at the controls....lol
                Keith


                http://www.flickr.com/photos/68459774@N05

                E500,E510 now dead,E520 (now retired),E600 and Grip,14-42,14-45,2x40-150,Sigmas 105 and 135-400 Now Dead..ex 25. Manfrotto 190. Plus lots of OM stuff.
                Now also 4 items from the dark side...........

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Forget me nots

                  Keith - How about an Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm lens f/4.8-6.7 MSC (35mm EFL = 150-600mm) ?

                  Or - a Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm lens f/4–5.6, Mega O.I.S. (35mm EFL = 200-600mm) ?

                  Should meet your needs ...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Forget me nots

                    Well the 300mm is a top class bit of kit and something I feel I can always rely on. Despite the amount of glass in it I think (not a scientific assessment) that it settles in AF quicker and more reliably than the 50-200mm + EC14. Most of my best butterfly shots have been made with this lens. I do find, however that the mZuiko 75-300mm has exceptional IQ only appearing to lose out on CA. There is hope!

                    Regards

                    David
                    PBase Galleries:-http://www.pbase.com/davidmorisonimages

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X