Tweet
I tried a different processing and would be grateful for comments, thanks.
Honey
George
Honey
George
-
The picture tells the story, great when you have a bad memory.DW. -
Re: Honey and George
Of the two I definitely prefer the first. The lighting is softer although perhaps a little direct?? hence lighting up the nostrils. Great detail though but probably prefer the 2cd background or possibly a neutral alternative.
Don't listen to me though as I prefer the opinions of others more qualified than myself
-
Re: Honey and George
Greg I am sure these are outside my comfort zone too.
The softer lighting on the first shot leads to better detail and I prefer the feel of the shot.OMD E-M1ii MMF3 8-25 f4 Pro 40-150 f2.8 pro MC-14 12-40 pro 14-42 EZ 9-18 f4.0 -5.6 40 -150f4-f5.6 R Laowa 50mm f2.8 macro Sigma 105 f2.8 macro Holga 60mm plastic Holga pinhole lens lens and an OM2sp
I nice view does not mean a good photograph. My FLickr
Comment
-
Re: Honey and George
I too prefer the first. The second has a distracting background. BTW i've been out with worse looking women than Honey!Stephen
A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture
Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film
My Flickr siteComment
-
Re: Honey and George
The second looks as if it is a "scrapbooked" image
I like the first but am very interested in what you did to achieve these and the "before" image too ? please David ?.
.
[I].
.
I Lurve Walking in our Glorious Countryside; Photography;
Riding Ducati Motorbikes; Reading & Cooking ! ...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomagicf1_chevvy/sets/
the ONE photo albumComment
-
Re: Honey and George
Cute looking dog and well taken now this may be just me but the post processing just does not do it for me as it just makes the dogs head appear to be floating in a void with nothing to anchor it. It would have been better to leave some of his lower body in the image.
Regards Paul.
One day I hope to be the person my dogs think I am.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/paul_silk/Comment
-
Re: Honey and George
Have to agree, Paul, but this is one of those " it's wet and cold out, what shall I do? " thingsOriginally posted by OlyPaul View PostCute looking dog and well taken now this may be just me but the post processing just does not do it for me as it just makes the dogs head appear to be floating in a void with nothing to anchor it. It would have been better to leave some of his lower body in the image.
The picture tells the story, great when you have a bad memory.DW.Comment
-
Re: Honey and George
I think the first image is terrific. I know one should not humanise dogs but, the hair slightly covering the left eye, the mouth slightly parted just showing teeth. Was she a temperamental model?My images on flickrComment
-
Re: Honey and George
She cordially hates the camera, I must have taken hundreds of shots to get this one, and this is one of about 20 this timeOriginally posted by dogsbody View Post
The picture tells the story, great when you have a bad memory.DW.Comment
-
Re: Honey and George
Full marks for trying something different and probably achieving what you had in mind.
To my personal taste I find the outcome too fussy and cutesy if that makes sense. However that is just my own take on it as I prefer a simpler view of things..
cheers
hecI've worked hard to be this grumpy. It hasn't been easy at times but it's worth it.Comment
-
Re: Honey and George
Our late Boxer hated the camera, whenever I got it out he used to give me a filthy look and walk out of the room. At the time I was using a Nikon. Hmmmmm I wonder if he was more intelligent than I realised?My images on flickrComment
Comment