Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hasn't the London skyline changed!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Hasn't the London skyline changed!

    Originally posted by Homer Simpson View Post
    But he did and designed in preventive measures. These were removed to save costs.
    In that case my slur on the profession is misplaced, and I should apologize. I wasn't aware of that.

    And then we come to the Millenium Bridge....

    I'll get my coat.....
    Ian

    (I can never think of anything witty to say when under pressure!)

    GH2, G50, various m4/3rds lenses, Fuji X-T1 system

    My website: www.icimaging.co.uk

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Hasn't the London skyline changed!

      Originally posted by Rawcoll View Post
      Indeed, hasn't the skyline changed! The curvy block building to the left of your gherkin skyline is what I think is called the walkie-talkie, the cause of the melting Jag. If only architects understood basic physics they'd realise that the front is essentially a concave mirror, and will focus sunlight on the street below.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Hasn't the London skyline changed!

        The sky line has changed dramatically since the millennium, with The eye, Brige, Gurkin Building, Shard, new new one opposite Lloyds (designed by same guy open about a year now) the building that melts plastic on cars (Walkie Talkie) to name a few. Yes it is true the Suits removed the preventative shielding to save costs & was a case of some argument with the designer who was proved right.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Hasn't the London skyline changed!

          I like this site, there is always someone who has information that I find fascinating, I knew next to nothing of any of these bits about the skyline, so thanks everyone

          Comment

          Working...
          X