Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cuteness

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cuteness

    I had to take the Mayor to Bridgend County Show over the weekend and couldn't resist taking a snap of these:


    Llamas by Cariadus, on Flickr

    Taken with E-M5 and 14-150mm. I believe the one in the front is a llama and the one behind is an alpaca - but please do correct me if you think that's wrong!

    And I thought this little fellow was also cute - taken in our garden yesterday:


    Sunlit web by Cariadus, on Flickr

    This is the first shot I've taken with the 75-300mm that I bought from Simon (Simon Bee). I did also try to take some shots with the 12-50 in macro mode but, even though I had to crop it a little, the result with the 75-300 was much better. I still struggle with macro shots of any kind, though.

    As always, comments/criticism welcome.
    Roger

    E-M5, 20mm/1.7, 45mm/1.8
    OM-1N, OM-10, OM-4ti, 24mm/2.8, 50mm/1.8, 85mm/2, Tamron 70-210mm/3.5
    cariadus.com | flickr | tumblr

  • #2
    Re: Cuteness

    Can't get enough of llamas, possibly my favourite animals.

    The spider being soft against the web works well with the lighting for me
    My Flickr

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Cuteness

      The monochrome works so well to detail that wonderful coat!
      Nice colours in the Web Shot

      With Macro, I find if I experiment on a tripod, it gives a very good idea of optimum focal distance. Also, if you get sharp manual focus at 35mm and look at the markings on the lens, then magnify to 100mm and refocus [ you might have to move back to do this ] and note the setting then 200m and 300mm the he same, you get a fixed idea of where you need to be away from the subject.
      Hope this helps
      The picture tells the story, great when you have a bad memory.DW.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Cuteness

        Thanks both. I did have a bit of trouble focussing the 75-300 on the web so I switched to manual focus and moved forward and back until the spider and web were sharp -which wasn't easy as the web was being blown by a slight breeze.
        Roger

        E-M5, 20mm/1.7, 45mm/1.8
        OM-1N, OM-10, OM-4ti, 24mm/2.8, 50mm/1.8, 85mm/2, Tamron 70-210mm/3.5
        cariadus.com | flickr | tumblr

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Cuteness

          Originally posted by al_kaholik View Post
          Can't get enough of llamas, possibly my favourite animals.
          Would they be alpacas, rather than llamas?

          Jim

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Cuteness

            Jim, I think they're one of each - llama in front and alpaca behind.
            Roger

            E-M5, 20mm/1.7, 45mm/1.8
            OM-1N, OM-10, OM-4ti, 24mm/2.8, 50mm/1.8, 85mm/2, Tamron 70-210mm/3.5
            cariadus.com | flickr | tumblr

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Cuteness

              What he said! The alpaca is smaller and has a different face. Their fur tends to be better too. They're also very timid in comparison and useless as guard animals when compared to the llama
              My Flickr

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Cuteness

                I quite like the lighting on No 2 the spider has a wrap around glow which is appealing to me.

                Tom
                "Who is watching the Watchers, watching the Watchers watching us"

                Its not what you see, it's the way that you see it"

                Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/photofxstudios

                Comment

                Working...
                X