Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

But Why?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • But Why?

    Saw this sign and had to add it to my "slow" collection.

    A quick quiz - can anybody guess why?


  • #2
    Re: But Why?

    Horses, perhaps.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: But Why?

      Ah that was too oooo easy :-)

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: But Why?

        Sorry! It's a great picture.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: But Why?

          65 horses or have they included flies too?
          Thanks
          Tim

          http://www.flickr.com/photos/33153464@N07/

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: But Why?

            Is that by any chance beside a village Common, where livestock is allowed to graze? Saw something similar in Norfolk a few years ago.
            The picture tells the story, great when you have a bad memory.DW.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: But Why?

              I think it is the New Forest so horses/ponies ; cows
              .
              .
              [I].
              .
              I Lurve Walking in our Glorious Countryside; Photography;
              Riding Ducati Motorbikes; Reading & Cooking ! ...


              http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomagicf1_chevvy/sets/

              the ONE photo album

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: But Why?

                I had that printed on the back of a T shirt when SWMBO was running .... With a gap between "pass" and "slow".
                Stephen

                A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

                Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

                My Flickr site

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: But Why?

                  Yes, the sign is in the New Forest.

                  There were a large number of ponies on the road so it is easy to see how a fatal collision could happen.

                  The number 65 looks to be a replacement, I wonder if the number went up or down from the original sign.

                  The colour scheme is also interesting, maybe we should have more colourful road signs

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: But Why?

                    Originally posted by timmypreston View Post
                    65 horses or have they included flies too?
                    It's 65 Animals, perhaps that includes deer and hedgehogs!

                    David
                    PBase Galleries:-http://www.pbase.com/davidmorisonimages

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: But Why?

                      Originally posted by Invicta View Post
                      Yes, the sign is in the New Forest.

                      There were a large number of ponies on the road so it is easy to see how a fatal collision could happen.

                      The number 65 looks to be a replacement, I wonder if the number went up or down from the original sign.

                      The colour scheme is also interesting, maybe we should have more colourful road signs

                      SAD thing is MOST of the animals killed in the NF are by Locals rushing to/from work the Tourists have all day

                      The animals counted are grazing eg horses/ponies ; cattle; sheep
                      .
                      .
                      [I].
                      .
                      I Lurve Walking in our Glorious Countryside; Photography;
                      Riding Ducati Motorbikes; Reading & Cooking ! ...


                      http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomagicf1_chevvy/sets/

                      the ONE photo album

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X