Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Neat Image comparison

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Neat Image comparison

    Anyone else ( in particular E1 owners cos you E3 guys may not need this ) using Neat Image noise reduction software? I was quite surprised by initial results so I posted them here for comment.

    My daughters hi-fi was the test subject, not meant to be a great shot as this was only a test, originally shot raw on tripod and 5 second mirror lock the original is at ISO 1600. Converted to jpeg in S2 with no alterations then run through NI with default parameters, just the luminance channel increased to 80% from 60%

    Both images resized for here with Irfanview and auto sharpening applied.

    The original ISO 1600 file


    The filtered image


    I also filtered some ISO 400 shots of the kids which were like them...a bit noisy and the results were excellent. For those like me who are new to this software a limited demo can be nabbed from here http://www.neatimage.com/

    Any views, tips etc... thanks.

  • #2
    All the best

    Being left handed my brain sometimes works sdrawkcab

    Andy

    Lots of cameras and lenses.


    My Flickr

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Neat Image comparison

      The 'neatimage' version certainly looks smoother, but I get the suspicion that detail is lost in the texture of the curtains and the front edge of the 'beech effect' MDF shelf.

      I suppose on balance the neatimage version is more satisfying.

      Jim

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Neat Image comparison

        I got it some time ago after being recomended else where - and with E400 issues in this area......

        I think it's an excellent tool for the overall armory and, unsurprisingly, it's use is the corollary to USM and it's best used selectively.

        I wouldn't want to be without it.
        E, Pen and OM-D bodies
        43 m43 and legacy glass
        loads of flashes and accessories from all the systems

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Neat Image comparison

          Interesting to read the comments. Jim, I too thought initially some detail was lost but upon checking the wooden base I would say the detail lost there is very very minor if any. Not sure about the curtains could not make up my mind.

          Rarely do I think I would need to go to ISO1600, possibly 800 and quite often 400 where NI is working incredibly well and has done wonders for some of my images in this area. I think these guys have earned their money with this, and with the $ in it`s weak state it`s drinks all around!

          Comment

          Working...
          X