What follows below are ‘rough-a*s*d' and not very scientific tests to judge the capability of my Oly 100-400 for close-up snaps.
I got to wondering as to whether I really need the new 90mm Macro, whenever it appears, at probably £1k+.
Most of my stuff isn’t macro it’s close-ups, butterflies, insects flowers and the like.
What is more important to me is not so much magnification but WORKING DISTANCE, the distance from the hood to the subject.
The working distance for the new 90mm will be I guess, a lot less than the 100-400.
The embroidered butterfly is roughly the size of a ‘common-blue’….about 31/32mm.
The combo of lens + TC1.4 proved most successful, with the added extension tubes it felt very unstable and fragile.
P1250055-RS by Dave in Wales, on Flickr
Images below are 'un-cropped'
400mm..WORKING DISTANCE APPROX..37 inches.
P1250057-RS by Dave in Wales, on Flickr
400mm + TC1.4..WORKING DISTANCE APPROX..55 inches.
P1250056-RS by Dave in Wales, on Flickr
400mm + TC1.4 + 26mm extension tube..WORKING DISTANCE APPROX 72 inches.
P1250058-RS by Dave in Wales, on Flickr
I got to wondering as to whether I really need the new 90mm Macro, whenever it appears, at probably £1k+.
Most of my stuff isn’t macro it’s close-ups, butterflies, insects flowers and the like.
What is more important to me is not so much magnification but WORKING DISTANCE, the distance from the hood to the subject.
The working distance for the new 90mm will be I guess, a lot less than the 100-400.
The embroidered butterfly is roughly the size of a ‘common-blue’….about 31/32mm.
The combo of lens + TC1.4 proved most successful, with the added extension tubes it felt very unstable and fragile.
P1250055-RS by Dave in Wales, on FlickrImages below are 'un-cropped'
400mm..WORKING DISTANCE APPROX..37 inches.
P1250057-RS by Dave in Wales, on Flickr400mm + TC1.4..WORKING DISTANCE APPROX..55 inches.
P1250056-RS by Dave in Wales, on Flickr400mm + TC1.4 + 26mm extension tube..WORKING DISTANCE APPROX 72 inches.
P1250058-RS by Dave in Wales, on Flickr


Comment