Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

50-200mm f2.8 foot clamp alert.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 50-200mm f2.8 foot clamp alert.

    A brief heads-up on an near-miss occurrence a couple of weeks ago while carrying the 50-200mm plus MC-14 on a BlackRapid sling strap, with the BR screw on the lens foot (I always check the tightness of that screw regularly while in use, it’s become a habit)

    I’d been in the Lakes for 4 nights doing landscape photography, and had used the lens quite a bit on my tripod for telephoto images, both portrait and landscape orientation (so I’d been loosening and closing the foot clamp quite often). I’d got a bit tired of 3 days’ frequent grey drizzle, so on my last day I headed back across the Pennines for a lovely sunny day at RSPB Fairburn Ings, east of Leeds. I hadn’t brought the 300 or the MC-20, so I was a bit under-lensed for proper birding, but I had a great day walking the attractive trails on the reserve with the gear swinging from the strap.

    I was just ambling back to the car for the drive back to Cambridge, when the foot clamp fully separated, and OM-1, converter and zoom headed for the ground.

    Fortunately I’d briefly left the hard, gravelly trail to peer over some bushes and it landed squarely on a soft, muddy grass bank, and absolutely no harm was done.

    After giving this some thought, I suspect I hadn’t fully tightened the clamp screw after my last use with the tripod the previous day and, as the phone image below shows, how I had the gear arranged then brought the clamp screw against my thigh, where it must had gradually further loosened as I walked.

    So, I’ve adjusted the routine position of lens in the clamp so the screw is no longer in contact with any part of me, and I’ve added checking the foot clamp screw to my regular BR screw checks every few hours. It’s had a lot of use in the past few days here in Grenada without problems, so fingers crossed my diagnosis and treatment are correct.

    The foot clamp screw has a fine thread, and you have to turn it quite a long way beyond first resistance to close it up fully. This makes it easy to set on the loose side to allow portrait-landscape rotation on a tripod, but my experience suggests it could leave it vulnerable to further loosening.

    Hope this helps someone.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6391.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	288.2 KB
ID:	1044349
    Regards,
    Mark

    ------------------------------
    http://www.microcontrast.com
    Too much Oly gear.
    Panasonic 8-18 & 15.
    Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70 & a Sony A7Cii.

  • #2
    Lucky escape!

    I'm slightly unsure as to what actually failed?

    Isn
    Founder and editor of:
    Olympus UK E-System User Group (https://www.e-group.uk.net)

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Ian View Post
      Lucky escape!

      I'm slightly unsure as to what actually failed?

      Isn
      From reading Mark's description, it is the screw that tightens up the ring with the tripod foot on it. The 50-200 appears to have have a completely different arrangement from earlier lenses. On the ones I've seen before, you can tighten the screw and the lens won't rotate, or loosen it so that you can adjust it on a tripod or similar. To remove it completely you loosen it and turn the ring to one specific orientation (usually upside-down I think) and it will slide off. With the 50-200 it looks as though the ring is in 2 bits which can separate completely if you undo the screw far enough. This seems to be what happened to Mark - the knob was rubbing on his troosies and loosening enough to undo the ring completely and initiate a "rapid unscheduled dis-assembly".

      I wonder why they have done this? I can't think of a useful reason.

      I suppose technically speaking it is not a "failure", it is "working as designed". Having worked at a customer on IBM software products for a very long time I have seen a lot of that!

      John

      Comment


      • drmarkf
        drmarkf commented
        Editing a comment
        Yes, that’s correct John.
        The 2 parts of the clamp are hinged opposite to the screw position, and if you (or your clothing!) keep unscrewing, it hinges fully open and the lens falls out.
        I remember at the time of launch reading/hearing that this allowed rapid removal or remounting of the foot without taking the lens off the camera.

    • #4
      Thanks for the heads up. I’ve just got this lens and planning a long walk with it today and it’ll be on a strap like this.

      That does sound like a lucky escape. These detachments can be quite alarming - I’ve had a body fall off a lens being carried like this as the mount didn’t quite click in place (also a soft landing sensor side up!).

      I have found with the 150-400mm the screw tightening the collar can come loose from rubbing on clothing but the consequences are just unexpected rotation of the collar.

      Another thing to add to the check list!

      BTW, I think the 100-400mm Mk ii has a hinged tripod collar like this too, so something to watch out for with that as well.

      Bill
      https://www.flickr.com/photos/macg33zr/

      Comment


      • drmarkf
        drmarkf commented
        Editing a comment
        You won’t be disappointed with the lens, Bill. It remains to be seen just how good the images actually are on screen, but it’s been excellent here for butterflies, bees & flowers in moderate closeup.
        We’re about to move to the north of the island where there are a lot more birds, especially hummers, and I found the 40-150 with the 1.4 converter good for those before.

    • #5
      That's interesting Mark. The 100-400 mk2 has the same type of foot, something to keep an eye on. Thanks for sharing.
      Steve

      Take only photographs, leave only bubbles.

      My Website
      Workshop

      Flickr

      Comment


      • #6
        I can understand how this can happen. Previous lens screw was slackened mount turned until it slid off. If that happened it could only move as far as the camera body. But with a clamp mount if it opens the lens falls out.
        As I have camo cover on the lens, this can't happen as the camo encircles the mount so it can't open.
        Derek

        ____________________________________________

        www.dncphotography.co.uk

        Comment


        • #7
          Originally posted by DerekC View Post
          I can understand how this can happen. Previous lens screw was slackened mount turned until it slid off. If that happened it could only move as far as the camera body. But with a clamp mount if it opens the lens falls out.
          As I have camo cover on the lens, this can't happen as the camo encircles the mount so it can't open.
          Sounds like this could be the basis for a DIY safety remedy.

          It looks like the 150-600 is all one piece, but I will have a closer look!

          Ian
          Founder and editor of:
          Olympus UK E-System User Group (https://www.e-group.uk.net)

          Comment

          Working...
          X