Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Walk-around lens..17mm/1.8, 25mm/1.8 or 14-42 mm F3.5-5.6 II R Lens

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Walk-around lens..17mm/1.8, 25mm/1.8 or 14-42 mm F3.5-5.6 II R Lens

    Looking for a sometime alternative to my 12-100, just a little lighter that won't break the bank.

    Is the Oly14-42 mm F3.5-5.6 II R Lens any good.

    HDEW prices.
    17mm...........£259
    25mm...........£209

    Amazon
    14-42mm.....£289

    What say we all


  • #2
    It's a choice between image quality and versatility Dave; the 14-42 is OK but the image quality of the other two outshine it. I used to have the 17mm and now have the 25mm and like that focal length (nifty fifty), but if I just take that I sometimes yearn for something wider.
    Iain
    OM-1, OM-1 II, 7.5FE, 8-25, 9, 12, 12-32, 12-40, 25, 40-150, 45, 60, 300
    MC-14, MC-20

    Website
    Flickr

    Comment


    • #3
      Phone, is my choice these days if I want something lighter weight. It has wider lenses and images look great.

      Comment


      • #4
        I have the 17 and love it. But I also have the Leica/Pana 25 and love THAT.

        Certainly, for a walkaround lens it is great to NOT have a zoom. No thought required apart from "Should I move closer?"

        Put me in for a vote for 17mm.

        Comment


        • #5
          14-42 used to be supplied as a kit lens I think.

          The 12-40 f/2.8
          Pro is a great compact lens.

          Comment


          • #6
            I’m packing my bag tonight for Walk the Wight tomorrow on the Isle of Wight.

            Was toying with the 17, 25 or 14-42EZ. Have settled on the 14-42EZ on an EPL8, it slips nicely into my rucksack side pocket.

            I bought my EPL8 with the 14-42EZ as an eBay open box for £299 I think (a few years ago). I couldn’t stomach buying the kit lens separately as it seemed so overpriced separately.
            Flickr https://flickr.com/photos/197765504@N02
            Cameras: E-M5iii
            Lenses: 17 f1.8,
            12-45 f4,14-42EZ, 40-150R
            And some awesome Billingham bags

            Comment


            • #7
              Actually I'd go instead for the Lumix 20/1.7 as it's tiny, I like the look of its images very much, and the focal length as a slightly wide standard works very nicely.
              thephotographersblock.wordpress.com

              Comment


              • Dave in Wales
                Dave in Wales commented
                Editing a comment
                Alternative, thank you....£250 fits the bill.

              • Bikie John
                Bikie John commented
                Editing a comment
                Jon beat me to it - it's a nice lens.

              • IainMacD
                IainMacD commented
                Editing a comment
                Great lens as far as image quality goes but I seem to remember the autofocus was a bit slow

            • #8
              Hi, in most cases a prime will be better than a zoom at a given focal length although with in-camera processing and lenses like the Panny 10-25 f1.7, zooms can be outstanding.

              Going back to 35mm SLR film days, a walk-about prime was often a 28mm, 35mm or 40mm lens which brings your 17mm into play. It's a nice focal length for landscapes or architecture. You can cheat on getting closer to an object if you are using a camera like the E-M1 III as you can opt for hand-held high resolution (50Mp) work which will allow you to crop the final image with no loss of resolution; even more so if you can pop the camera onto a firm surface as you can shoot at a whopping 80Mp.

              Comment


              • #9
                Originally posted by Dave in Wales View Post
                Looking for a sometime alternative to my 12-100, just a little lighter that won't break the bank.

                Is the Oly14-42 mm F3.5-5.6 II R Lens any good.

                HDEW prices.
                17mm...........£259
                25mm...........£209

                Amazon
                14-42mm.....£289
                I wouldn't pay NEW retail for the 12-42mm II R - it was bundled with lots of PEN series cameras and used to be available used for <£100.
                Looks like prices have climbed recently.
                I have this lens and the more compact EZ 14-42mm both are competent walk about lenses and give similar results.
                The II R is a bit larger but has a manual zoom which I like
                The EZ is much smaller but has an electronic zoom which is a bit less accurate and fast going from wide to tele

                I stopped using either when I got the 12-40 PRO even though it's much bigger and heavier - the quality makes up for the negatives.

                I have the Panasonic 25mm F1.7 which is an under rated lens and fantastic value for money - but I find 25mm is a bit long for general walk about duties.

                The Olympus 17mm f1.8 is a cracking lens and is my minimal option for evenings/restaurants/museums etc.

                If wanted a great walkabout then the 12-40 f2.8 or the 12-45 f4 would be my choice assuming you are happy to spend the money.
                https://www.flickr.com/photos/amcuk/

                Comment


                • #10
                  If I take my 12-100 for a day long shoot I often take the Panasonic 20mm f1.7 and the Olympus 45mm f1.8 along. They're both sharp; they're both small and light, and they provide more than two extra stops of light should it be required. They're also an occasional relief from the heavier zoom lens.

                  Comment


                  • #11
                    I’m going to retract (sort of) my previous statement about the 14-42EZ. The electronic zoom was a bit of a hindrance to use all day. I can see how as an occasional use it’s perfect due to its size but for more than one off shots, it was annoying.

                    I previously owned the other 14-42 version but the locking retraction thing bugged me also so I think the 12-45 f4 will be the best option or the 17 f1.8 (for overall focal length typical use).
                    Flickr https://flickr.com/photos/197765504@N02
                    Cameras: E-M5iii
                    Lenses: 17 f1.8,
                    12-45 f4,14-42EZ, 40-150R
                    And some awesome Billingham bags

                    Comment


                    • #12
                      I have a TT Artisans 17mm f1.4, it's a fully manual lens that's very well made and performs very well in my opinion and only costs around £113 on E-Bay

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X