Advice wanted...
In work we currently us a rather old and fairly basic Nikon camera, mostly vertical mounted, in order to take pictures of geological specimens - for publication and databasing. We may have the chance this year to upgrade to a nicer set-up.
Obviously I'll recommend selling all our kit and getting an E5, but we may end up having to stay with Nikon!. However... I'm interested in your views about the best combination of say two lenses - using the Oly versions to make it easy for me to visualise.
I love my 50mm, and on a vertical mount it'll do quite a range of sizes of specimens. But would a 12-60 be better/as good - and would allow more versatility when used hand held for larger objects.
Also, does the EX25 work well with the 12-60 for smaller stuff?
If they decide to stay with the Nikon brand, then they do a really nice 105mm macro, but would we also need a wider angle ?zoom? lens as well then?
Oh dear - too many options!
In work we currently us a rather old and fairly basic Nikon camera, mostly vertical mounted, in order to take pictures of geological specimens - for publication and databasing. We may have the chance this year to upgrade to a nicer set-up.
Obviously I'll recommend selling all our kit and getting an E5, but we may end up having to stay with Nikon!. However... I'm interested in your views about the best combination of say two lenses - using the Oly versions to make it easy for me to visualise.
I love my 50mm, and on a vertical mount it'll do quite a range of sizes of specimens. But would a 12-60 be better/as good - and would allow more versatility when used hand held for larger objects.
Also, does the EX25 work well with the 12-60 for smaller stuff?
If they decide to stay with the Nikon brand, then they do a really nice 105mm macro, but would we also need a wider angle ?zoom? lens as well then?
Oh dear - too many options!

Comment