Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AF not as accurate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: AF not as accurate

    Originally posted by BreezeG View Post
    Meh!, just went out today to trail the camera on birds. About 2% keeper rate!
    Obviously operator error, Ive just noticed both tracking and face recognition are on.
    Must do better, will try again tomorrow.
    Loving the resolving power of the 14-150 f2.8 Pro though, these were taken with the 1.4 TC attached.
    Turn face recognition off, it slows the camera down.

    Please see my reply to Walti also,

    Dave

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: AF not as accurate

      Originally posted by BreezeG View Post
      Meh!, just went out today to trail the camera on birds. About 2% keeper rate!
      Obviously operator error, Ive just noticed both tracking and face recognition are on.
      Must do better, will try again tomorrow.
      Loving the resolving power of the 14-150 f2.8 Pro though, these were taken with the 1.4 TC attached.
      Tracking is a waste of space - turn it off. Face recognition is very good, but only for faces


      I discussed CAF setup with Tesni Ward, who spoke at The Photography Show about using the mkii on wildlife (with excellent results), and her recommendations are:

      - CAF Scanner - mode 2
      - Tracking off
      - Single focus point, with 5 or 9 point sometimes if the subject suits it
      - AF Lock - tight (-5)

      Technique then requires keeping the subject under the focus point (s). If Olympus ever fix tracking, it'll make this aspect a lot simpler!
      Paul
      E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
      flickr
      Portfolio Site
      Instagram

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: AF not as accurate

        Originally posted by pdk42 View Post
        Tracking is a waste of space - turn it off. Face recognition is very good, but only for faces


        I discussed CAF setup with Tesni Ward, who spoke at The Photography Show about using the mkii on wildlife (with excellent results), and her recommendations are:

        - CAF scanner mode 2
        - Tracking off
        - Single focus point, with 5 or 9 point sometimes
        - AF lock - tight (-5)

        Technique then requires keeping the subject under the focus point (s).
        I disagree about tracking, I used it on the E-M1 and continue to do so on the Mark II.

        The camera will only track as long as the operator is keeping up with subject, I agree it's not perfect but it does work.

        I also found it useful when photographing static Damselfiles and Dragonflies on windy days, the focus point moved with the subject and helped increase my keeper rate, ymmv.

        Thanks for listing Tesni's recommendations, I'll compare these with my current settings.

        Dave

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: AF not as accurate

          Originally posted by BreezeG View Post
          Meh!, just went out today to trail the camera on birds. About 2% keeper rate!
          Obviously operator error, Ive just noticed both tracking and face recognition are on.
          Must do better, will try again tomorrow.
          Loving the resolving power of the 14-150 f2.8 Pro though, these were taken with the 1.4 TC attached.
          Have you checked the RLS Priority settings for S-AF & C-AF? (See Cog C1).
          Also AF Limiter - Priority Release (See Cog A1) - if you're using the AF-Limiter functions.
          If these items are set to "On" - the shutter can be fired even though AF confirmation has not occurred.
          Chris

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: AF not as accurate

            Originally posted by DavyG View Post
            I disagree about tracking, I used it on the E-M1 and continue to do so on the Mark II.

            The camera will only track as long as the operator is keeping up with subject, I agree it's not perfect but it does work.

            I also found it useful when photographing static Damselfiles and Dragonflies on windy days, the focus point moved with the subject and helped increase my keeper rate, ymmv.

            Thanks for listing Tesni's recommendations, I'll compare these with my current settings.

            Dave
            Ah, so you have managed to get tracking to work then? That's good to know - I've always found it failed miserably. What I do know is that it's a feature that's a hang over from older implementations. I suspect it only works using contrast AF too, but I could be wrong.
            Paul
            E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
            flickr
            Portfolio Site
            Instagram

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: AF not as accurate

              Originally posted by Gwyver View Post
              Have you checked the RLS Priority settings for S-AF & C-AF? (See Cog C1).
              Also AF Limiter - Priority Release (See Cog A1) - if you're using the AF-Limiter functions.
              If these items are set to "On" - the shutter can be fired even though AF confirmation has not occurred.
              Thanks for that, will check them out.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: AF not as accurate

                Not sure this case is connected with the discussion, but just in case it may help....

                I'm currently in the process of fine tuning my settings on the em1.2 (coming from em5) for birding.

                One major enhancement to my focus rate was to set lens reset parameter to OFF (default is ON). The issue is that in the time lapse between one bird and the next, the camera frecuently enters in idle mode, and this mode reset the lens forcing it to refocus the scene, making useless to pre-focus at a given place where you are expecting the bird to stop.

                I was previously assuming that this reset happens when camera is switched off, but it also happens when entering in Low power modes.

                With birds moving so fast, I was missing focus constantly...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: AF not as accurate

                  No focusing problems to report with mine.
                  Very pleased with the results both from S-AF and C-AF.
                  Regards Huw


                  Olympus equipment
                  Capture One Pro
                  My flickr

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: AF not as accurate

                    Originally posted by Walti View Post
                    I've rattled off a few in the garden this morning and am quite underwhelmed so far!

                    I'm going to do a back to back to see what the difference is, but I'm getting a lot of out of focus and blurred photos I simply don't get with the MKi - so some settings to be investigated I think (hope)...

                    I'm disappointed with the my sets on the dial only as well (I've set two up onto buttons on the MKi which allows me to switch without taking my eye from the viewfinder.... I'm not sure I can manage this so well from the dial)
                    Seems Me and Walti are the only 2 having issues?

                    I do not use the multi AF points, I have set it to single AF smack in the middle. SA-F in all my test. off. Question, Did I get as lemon set? Or after all these years of using an Oly camera, this is one unit that really need me to change my shooting style?

                    Here is an example of the error..all shots are shot with Single exposure SA-F.

                    The subject is practically stationary. I do not have this issue with the mk1.

                    The start of the sequence, is tack sharp. No complains.


                    Crop of the above.


                    The camera beeps an AF confirmation and..


                    Crop of the above..


                    A few shots later..


                    Crop of the above...


                    More pictures of the sequence are here.
                    * Henry
                    * Location: Subang Jaya, Selangor
                    * Malaysia


                    All my garbage so far.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: AF not as accurate

                      Interesting comments and info here. So far on my one outing I found the Mk2 focusing to be much more assured than my mk1 especially with my Lumix 14-140. The 40-150 also seemed to work well but then it did with my mark 1. I. It's a lot better than the mk1 with my Pan/Leica 14-150. I think the main improvement is from the cross type focus points.
                      http://www.flickr.com/photos/flip_photo_flickr/

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: AF not as accurate

                        Hi I have looked at your sequence of images A your shutter speed was 1/100th

                        B you were shooting in Single AF mode,

                        C The subject is moving parts of the body i.e. arms maybe head rocking back and Forth

                        D.shallow depth of field ie f2.8 as s-af only focuses upon the first frame would explain first is sharp all this information would indicate that to be operator error not camera error. Any movment at these settings with a telephoto lens would show some form of out of focus blurring on shots after the first.

                        This is my observation of these shots and camera settings.
                        My Published Book: http://www.blurb.com/my/book/detail/2771168

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: AF not as accurate

                          I'm still trying to work out what I've done wrong - The camera seems fine and has been subjected to a factory reset, so I'll start again!

                          Enthusiasm has taken a bit of a hit though!

                          I think I need to switch to CF+TR to resolve the issues I think I've had - I'll give it a go and report back!
                          Paul

                          I didn’t get where I am today....

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: AF not as accurate

                            No AF problems here. Been using the Mark 2 since last December and find it better than the Mark 1. It will be nice to have the smaller focus point if they reintroduce that.
                            Andy
                            bengeo.com

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: AF not as accurate

                              Originally posted by Daveart View Post
                              Hi I have looked at your sequence of images A your shutter speed was 1/100th

                              B you were shooting in Single AF mode,

                              C The subject is moving parts of the body i.e. arms maybe head rocking back and Forth

                              D.shallow depth of field ie f2.8 as s-af only focuses upon the first frame would explain first is sharp all this information would indicate that to be operator error not camera error. Any movment at these settings with a telephoto lens would show some form of out of focus blurring on shots after the first.

                              This is my observation of these shots and camera settings.
                              The problem is that Image stabilization is so good we take it for granted. It is easy to forget that whilst it prevents blurring due to camera shake, it has no effect upon subject movement. I suspect the subject was quite an animated speaker and 1/100th of a second was just too slow. The ISO was only 400 and I would have been inclined to crank it up to at least 1600 for a faster shutter speed.
                              John

                              "A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there � even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: AF not as accurate

                                Originally posted by c12402 View Post
                                Not sure this case is connected with the discussion, but just in case it may help....

                                I'm currently in the process of fine tuning my settings on the em1.2 (coming from em5) for birding.

                                One major enhancement to my focus rate was to set lens reset parameter to OFF (default is ON). The issue is that in the time lapse between one bird and the next, the camera frecuently enters in idle mode, and this mode reset the lens forcing it to refocus the scene, making useless to pre-focus at a given place where you are expecting the bird to stop.

                                I was previously assuming that this reset happens when camera is switched off, but it also happens when entering in Low power modes.

                                With birds moving so fast, I was missing focus constantly...
                                Good catch! I previously thought that Lens Reset only reset the focal length of an electrically zoomed lens, not the focus distance.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X